Grips Intelligence in-store data for Panasonic — a brand of Panasonic Holdings Corporation (TYO: 6752) — tracks performance from January 1 to July 31, 2026 across five channels: Amazon, Lowe's, Newegg, Home Depot and Best Buy. Amazon dominates the mix with 73.5% of year-to-date revenue, leaving Lowe's (9.3%) and Newegg (8.0%) as distant secondary channels and Best Buy trailing at just 3.7%. Momentum has been positive in the most recent quarter, with revenue up 12.0% month over month and 13.7% higher across the May–July window. Pricing has climbed even faster, with the average selling price rising 5.3% in the latest month to $89.15 and 14.9% over the three-month period, well above the $81.36 year-to-date average. That combination of rising volume and rising price points suggests a mix shift toward premium items, a pattern reinforced by Newegg's assortment, where projector listings reach as high as $12,835.99.
OVER TIME
Over the last three months, revenue on tracked channels has grew by 16% from May to Jul.
OVER TIME
Over the last three months, average selling price on tracked channels has increased by 16% from May to Jul.
REVENUE SHARE
Revenue distribution across product categories for Panasonic on Best Buy.
REVENUE SHARE
Revenue distribution across tracked channels for Panasonic.
BY REVENUE
Panasonic sells 91% online and 9% offline. Online runs through 4 channels; offline through 4.
Online
91%
9%
Offline
Online channels
91%
Offline channels
9%
BY REVIEW COUNT
Across 12M ratings on 5 channels, Panasonic averages 4.3★. Most reviews for the products are in the 4.2–4.4 range.
BRAND AVERAGE
4.3
/ 5
From 12M ratings
Products are bracketed by their average rating, so all of an individual product's reviews fall into one bracket. This isn't a per-star breakdown of individual reviews.
BY REVENUE
$179.99
Price
$5.1M
Revenue
$568.90
Price
$1.25M
Revenue
$259.95
Price
$1.1M
Revenue
$135.99
Price
$1.06M
Revenue
$204.37
Price
$975K
Revenue
$149.99
Price
Revenue
$329.99
Price
Revenue
$89.99
Price
Revenue
Get access to full product performance analysis