According to Grips Intelligence in-store data tracked from January 1 to September 30, 2026 across Amazon, menards.com, acehardware.com, homedepot.com and lowes.com, OOK — a brand under Hillman Solutions Corp. (NASDAQ: HLMN) — generated nearly half of its year-to-date revenue on Amazon at a 44.7% share. Menards is the clear second channel at 32.6%, with acehardware.com (12.0%), homedepot.com (7.0%) and lowes.com (3.6%) splitting the remainder, leaving roughly three-quarters of sales concentrated in just two retailers. Revenue has softened over the measured window, falling 7.7% month-over-month and 12.0% overall across the July–September timeseries period. At the same time, average selling price moved in the opposite direction, rising 22.3% month-over-month to $6.59 and 17.9% overall against a year-to-date average of $5.66. That divergence between declining revenue and climbing price points suggests a shift toward higher-value units rather than volume growth.
OVER TIME
Over the last three months, revenue on tracked channels has declined by 4% from Jul to Sep.
OVER TIME
Over the last three months, average selling price on tracked channels has decreased by 3% from Jul to Sep.
REVENUE SHARE
Revenue distribution across product categories for OOK on Ace Hardware.
REVENUE SHARE
Revenue distribution across tracked channels for OOK.
BY REVENUE
OOK sells 56% online and 44% offline. Online runs through 3 channels; offline through 2.
Online
56%
44%
Offline
Online channels
56%
Offline channels
44%
BY REVIEW COUNT
Across 375K ratings on 5 channels, OOK averages 4.6★. Most reviews for the products are in the 4.6–4.8 range.
BRAND AVERAGE
4.6
/ 5
From 375K ratings
Products are bracketed by their average rating, so all of an individual product's reviews fall into one bracket. This isn't a per-star breakdown of individual reviews.
BY REVENUE
$24.67
Price
$96K
Revenue
$11.62
Price
$61K
Revenue
$14.64
Price
$25K
Revenue
$20.99
Price
$23K
Revenue
$149.99
Price
Revenue
$329.99
Price
Revenue
$89.99
Price
Revenue
Get access to full product performance analysis