According to Grips Intelligence in-store data tracked across Amazon, menards.com and Office Depot from January 1 to August 31, 2026, Fisher — a brand of John B. Sanfilippo & Son (NASDAQ: JBSS) — generated 58.4% of its revenue on Amazon, with menards.com close behind at 39.4% and Office Depot contributing just 1.2%. That near-even split between the two leading channels is unusual, and it reflects sharply different assortments at each: Menards demand concentrates on value-sized peanut items priced between roughly $2.85 and $6.56, while Amazon skews toward premium nut assortments in the $17 to $22 range. The brand's average product price across all tracked channels sits at $9.62, rising to $9.96 in the most recent month. Average price climbed 5.4% over the measured period, including a 1.4% month-over-month increase. Revenue grew 4.4% overall and 2.8% versus the prior month, suggesting Fisher's pricing gains have not come at the expense of volume.
OVER TIME
Over the last three months, revenue on tracked channels has grew by 4% from Jun to Aug.
OVER TIME
Over the last three months, average selling price on tracked channels has increased by 5% from Jun to Aug.
REVENUE SHARE
Revenue distribution across product categories for Fisher on Amazon.
REVENUE SHARE
Revenue distribution across tracked channels for Fisher.
BY REVENUE
Fisher sells 59% online and 41% offline. Online runs through 2 channels; offline through 2.
Online
59%
41%
Offline
Online channels
59%
Offline channels
41%
BY REVIEW COUNT
Across 1.7M ratings on 3 channels, Fisher averages 4.6★. Most reviews for the products are in the 4.6–4.8 range.
BRAND AVERAGE
4.6
/ 5
From 1.7M ratings
Products are bracketed by their average rating, so all of an individual product's reviews fall into one bracket. This isn't a per-star breakdown of individual reviews.
BY REVENUE
$21.61
Price
$510K
Revenue
$19.31
Price
$489K
Revenue
$18.37
Price
$367K
Revenue
$21.31
Price
$205K
Revenue
$149.99
Price
Revenue
$329.99
Price
Revenue
$89.99
Price
Revenue
Get access to full product performance analysis