According to Grips Intelligence in-store data tracked across Amazon, Office Depot, and Newegg from January 1 to June 30, 2026, VERBATIM—owned by Taiwan Stock Exchange-listed CMC Magnetics (TWSE: 2323)—generated the vast majority of its offline revenue on Amazon, which is listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange, Code: 2323, commanding a 75.6% channel share. Office Depot followed as the second-largest channel at 19.5%, with Newegg accounting for a comparatively minor 4.0%. The brand's average product price rose 2.8% over the period to $21.69, signaling gradual pricing gains even as revenue softened. That softening was notable, with revenue slipping 4.1% across the tracked window and declining 3.9% month-over-month in the most recent period. Together, these Grips Intelligence figures point to a highly Amazon-concentrated channel mix paired with modest pricing strength against a backdrop of easing top-line performance.
OVER TIME
Over the last three months, revenue on tracked channels has declined by 4% from Apr to Jun.
OVER TIME
Over the last three months, average selling price on tracked channels has increased by 3% from Apr to Jun.
REVENUE SHARE
Revenue distribution across product categories for VERBATIM on Amazon.
REVENUE SHARE
Revenue distribution across tracked channels for VERBATIM.
BY REVENUE
VERBATIM sells 80% online and 20% offline. Online runs through 3 channels; offline through 1. Online share has moved from 22% in Feb to 82% in Jun.
Online
80%
20%
Offline
Online channels
80%
Offline channels
20%
BY REVIEW COUNT
Across 707K ratings on 4 channels, VERBATIM averages 4.6★. Most reviews for the products are in the 4.6–4.8 range.
BRAND AVERAGE
4.6
/ 5
From 707K ratings
Products are bracketed by their average rating, so all of an individual product's reviews fall into one bracket. This isn't a per-star breakdown of individual reviews.
BY REVENUE
$24.49
Price
$248K
Revenue
$16.28
Price
$239K
Revenue
$11.10
Price
$173K
Revenue
$149.99
Price
Revenue
$329.99
Price
Revenue
$89.99
Price
Revenue
Get access to full product performance analysis