According to Grips Intelligence, Martha Stewart's in-store performance across Amazon, Home Depot, and Lowe's from January 1 to June 30, 2026 shows revenue grew 11.5% over the period, while the average product price rose 23.2% to an overall figure of $78.09. Revenue is remarkably balanced across the three tracked retailers, with Marquee Brands—owner of the Martha Stewart brand—being privately held by investor funds managed by Neuberger Berman, Amazon leading at 36.2% share, followed closely by homedepot.com at 32.5% and lowes.com at 31.3%. Pricing strategy diverges sharply by channel, with Amazon anchored by lower-ticket cutlery and cookware sets while Lowe's skews toward premium patio and dining sets priced well above $1,400. During the April 1 to June 30, 2026 timeseries window, the average price reached $95.34, though it dipped 3.5% month-over-month even as the longer-term trend pointed upward. This blend of near-even channel distribution and steep average-price appreciation underscores the brand's shifting mix toward higher-value home and outdoor categories.
OVER TIME
Over the last three months, revenue on tracked channels has grew by 12% from Apr to Jun.
OVER TIME
Over the last three months, average selling price on tracked channels has increased by 23% from Apr to Jun.
REVENUE SHARE
Revenue distribution across product categories for MARTHA STEWART on Amazon.
REVENUE SHARE
Revenue distribution across tracked channels for MARTHA STEWART.
BY REVIEW COUNT
Across 281K ratings on 3 channels, MARTHA STEWART averages 4.6★. Most reviews for the products are in the 4.6–4.8 range.
BRAND AVERAGE
4.6
/ 5
From 281K ratings
Products are bracketed by their average rating, so all of an individual product's reviews fall into one bracket. This isn't a per-star breakdown of individual reviews.
BY REVENUE
$132.03
Price
$1.04M
Revenue
$59.99
Price
$479K
Revenue
$179.99
Price
$348K
Revenue
$189.99
Price
$314K
Revenue
$79.99
Price
$279K
Revenue
$149.99
Price
Revenue
$329.99
Price
Revenue
$89.99
Price
Revenue
Get access to full product performance analysis